New research shows that children with autism can create imaginary friends

Playing with an imaginary companion helps children learn essential social skills such as empathy with other people. It is often believed that autistic youngsters are incapable of creating pretend play pals — a further hindrance to their development of emotional understanding.

But now a research project headed by Dr Paige Davis a lecturer in Psychology at the University of Huddersfield confirms that children diagnosed with autism are able to create and play with imaginary friends. Further research is to be conducted and could eventually help to develop new therapies.

The research described in the Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders by Dr Davis and her three co-authors is based on evidence gathered in the USA and UK from 215 questionnaires completed by approximately equal numbers of parents of children with typical development and of children diagnosed with autistic spectrum disorder.

The findings do indicate that fewer children on the autistic spectrum create an imaginary companion — 16.2 per cent as opposed to 42 per cent of other children. Also children with autism began playing with their imaginary friends at a significantly later age and were proportionately more likely to play with a “personified object” such as a stuffed toy or doll.

But the argument of the new article from Dr Davis is that while there is a quantitative difference between the developments of imaginary friends between the two categories of children, there is no difference in the quality of the play.

The article includes examples of some of the imaginary companions created by children with autism whose parents took part in the project. They include Ghosty Bubble, an invisible bubble person who slept on a bubble bed next to the child; Mikey, an invisible Ninja who lived in a sewer; and Pretend Ada, an invisible version of a real school pal who played with the child when she needed a friend.

“The finding that children diagnosed with autism even spontaneously create such imaginary companions refutes existing beliefs that they are not imagining in the same way as typically developing children,” said Dr Davis.

“Imaginary companions are special because they are social in nature and children with autism have issues with social development and communication. So if you are actually creating a mind for an imaginary person you are involving yourself in a range of social activities that the autism diagnosis itself would say you couldn’t do.”

Dr Davis argues that if children with ASD are showing the same positive social developments as TD youngsters from the creation of ICs, then that could have implications for future intervention and lead to new therapies based on the imagination.

Her collaborators on the research and co-authors of the article were Elizabeth Meins of the University of York, Haley Simon of Drexel University in Philadelphia, USA, and Diana Robins of the AJ Drexel Autism Institute in Philadelphia. The article — titled Imaginary Companions in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder — describes the research methodology and the findings in detail.

Now there are plans for further research into the benefits of imaginary companions to typically developing children and whether the same applies to autistic youngsters.

Photo:  Miniatures by Karen Mardahl

19th century melodrama acting – a workshop

“pathos, overwrought or heightened emotion, moral polarization (good vs. evil), non-classical narrative structure (e.g., use of extreme coincidence and deus ex machine), and sensationalism”

That is how melodrama has been described by Ben Singer in his book Melodrama and Modernity (Columbia University Press)

Playing in those melodramas required a very particular acting style.  Now a project at the University of Warwick is offering the opportunity to train in the acting styles and theatrical traditions of 19th Century melodrama, and audition for a role in Pixerécourt’s Fortress.

The workshop will take place at 10am-5pm, 17 June 2017 at the Georgian Theatre Royal, Richmond. Cost: Free.  (Booking essential)

  • Exciting opportunity for adults (over 16s) to receive free expert training in the acting styles and theatrical traditions of 19th-century melodrama, within the country’s most complete Georgian playhouse, as part of a project funded by the AHRC.
  • Chance to audition for a role in a production of Guilbert de Pixerécourt’s The Fortress on the Danube (1805), to be performed across a week at the Theatre Royal Richmond during the Georgian Festival, marking the first adaptation of an early French melodrama to appear in over a century.

The Workshop

Guided by 19th-century theatre specialists and a professional director, attendees will be offered the chance to develop skills in melodramatic acting techniques including:

  • The externalisation of emotion
  • The ability to move to music
  • The delivery of a melodramatic script

By partaking in stimulating practical exercises, participants will acquire in-depth knowledge of the stylistically unique genre that dominated early nineteenth-century theatre.

The Audition

All attendees are invited to audition for a role in Pixerécourt’s Fortress, a melodrama exploring the conflict between love and duty. A range of parts are on offer, big and small, serious and comic, including a sentimental father, a cross-dressed daughter, and a drunken castle-keeper.
No previous acting experience is required. Auditionees must be available to rehearse and perform in Richmond between 20-25th August 2017.

Performance: Friday 25th August 2017, 7.30pm

The Team

Sarah Wynne Kordas: Professional Director and actor with 17 years theatrical experience. Producer of three short films, and recently commissioned to write her first feature length screen play. Currently touring as Nurse Paisley in Anthony Horowitz’s Mindgame with Tabs Productions, and guest-directing new writing for the Windsor Fringe Festival.
Dr Katherine Astbury: Chief investigator of AHRC-funded project ‘Staging Napoleonic Theatre’. Co-organiser of 2014 workshop ‘The Melodramatic Moment: 1790-1820.’ Presently working with English Heritage to stage a production at Portchester Castle of French melodrama Roseliska ou amour, haine et vengeance.
Dr Sarah Burdett: Theatre historian specialising in early 19th-century acting styles and British melodrama of the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Periods. Has co-directed and acted in Brechtian performances staged at venues including the Edinburgh Fringe Festival and the Norwich Puppet Theatre with K2 Productions.
Dr Diane Tisdall: Professional violinist and music historian specialising in 19th-century French music and culture. Trained at internationally acclaimed institutions including the Université Aix-Marseille, the Royal Welsh College of Music and Drama, and Newcastle Conservatorium, Australia.

Booking

Food and Drink Provided. If wishing to attend, please complete a booking form

Rhinos should be conserved in Africa, not moved to Australia

Rhinos are one of the most iconic symbols of the African savanna: grey behemoths with armour plating and fearsome horns. And yet it is the horns that are leading to their demise. Poaching is so prolific that zoos cannot even protect them.

Some people believe rhino horns can cure several ailments; others see horns as status symbols. Given horns are made of keratin, this is really about as effective as chewing your finger nails. Nonetheless, a massive increase in poaching over the past decade has led to rapid declines in some rhino species, and solutions are urgently needed.

One proposal is to take 80 rhinos from private game farms in South Africa and transport them to captive facilities in Australia, at a cost of over US$4m. Though it cannot be denied that this is a “novel” idea, I, and colleagues from around the world, have serious concerns about the project, and we have now published a paper looking into the problematic plan.

This post, by Matt Hayward, Senior Lecturer in Conservation, Bangor University, first appeared on The Conversation website.

Conservation cost

The first issue is whether the cost of moving the rhinos is unjustified. The $4m cost is almost double the anti-poaching budget for South African National Parks ($2.2m), the managers of the estate where most white rhinos currently reside in the country.

The money would be better spent on anti-poaching activities in South Africa to increase local capacity. Or, from an Australian perspective, given the country’s abysmal record of mammal extinctions, it could go towards protecting indigenous species there.

In addition, there is the time cost of using the expertise of business leaders, marketeers and scientists. All could be working on conservation issues of much greater importance.

Bringing animals from the wild into captivity introduces strong selective pressure for domestication. Essentially, those animals that are too wild don’t breed and so don’t pass on their genes, while the sedate (unwild) animals do. This is exacerbated for species like rhinos where predation has shaped their evolution: they have grown big, dangerous horns to protect themselves. So captivity will likely be detrimental to the survival of any captive bred offspring should they be returned to the wild.

Poaching is still a huge problem, despite a resurgence in the southern white rhino population. Author provided

It is not known yet which rhino species will be the focus of the Australian project, but it will probably be the southern white rhino subspecies – which is the rhino species least likely to go extinct. The global population estimate for southern white rhinos (over 20,000) is stable, despite high poaching levels.

This number stands in stark contrast to the number of northern white (three), black (4,880 and increasing), great Indian (2,575), Sumatran (275) and Javan (up to 66) rhinos. These latter three species are clearly of much greater conservation concern than southern white rhinos.

There are also well over 800 southern white rhinos currently held in zoos around the world.

With appropriate management, the population size of the southern white is unlikely to lose genetic diversity, so adding 80 more individuals to zoos is utterly unnecessary. By contrast, across the world there are 39 other large mammalian herbivore species that are threatened with extinction that are far more in need of conservation funding than the five rhino species.

Exploitation

Rhinos inhabit places occupied by other less high profile threatened species – like African wild dogs and pangolins – which do not benefit from the same level of conservation funding. Conserving wildlife in their natural habitat has many benefits for the creatures and plants they coexist with. Rhinos are keystone species, creating grazing lawns that provide habitats for other species and ultimately affect fire regimes (fire frequency and burn patterns). They are also habitats themselves for a range of species-specific parasites. Abandoning efforts to conserve rhinos in their environment means these ecosystem services will no longer be provided.

Finally, taking biodiversity assets (rhinos) from Africa and transporting them to foreign countries extends the history of exploitation of Africa’s resources. Although well-meaning, the safe-keeping of rhinos by Western countries is as disempowering and patronising as the historical appropriation of cultural artefacts by colonial powers.

Conservation projects are ultimately more successful when led locally. With its strong social foundation, community-based conservation has had a significant impact on rhino protection and population recovery in Africa. In fact, local capacity and institutions are at the centre of one of the world’s most successful conservation success stories – the southern white rhino was brought back from the brink, growing from a few hundred in South Africa at the turn of the last century to over 20,000 throughout southern Africa today.

In our opinion, this project is neo-colonial conservation that diverts money and public attention away from the fundamental issues necessary to conserve rhinos. There is no evidence of what will happen to the rhinos transported to Australia once the poaching crisis is averted, but there seems nothing as robust as China’s “panda diplomacy” where pandas provided to foreign zoos remain the property of China, alongside a substantial annual payment, as do any offspring produced, for the duration of the arrangement.

With increased support, community-based rhino conservation initiatives can continue to lead the way. It is money that is missing, not the will to conserve them nor the expertise necessary to do so. Using the funding proposed for the Australian Rhino Project to support locally-led conservation or to educate people to reduce consumer demand for rhino horn in Asia seem far more acceptable options.

Main photo by Julian Lim

Trump: the first hundred days

What is the scorecard for President Donald Trump after the first 100 Days?  “C minus overall,” says Peter Trubowitz, Professor of International Relations and Director of the US Centre at the London School of Economics and Political Science and Associate Fellow at Chatham House, Royal Institute of International Affairs. Trump said he was going to shake up Washington, and he has, but on the legislative front he has done little of what he promised in his first 100 days.

Alex Burd talked to Professor Trubowitz last year during the presidential race, now he returns to get the Professor’s view on the new President’s first 100 days.

Listen to Alex Burd’s earlier podcasts with Professor Trubowitz:  The Rise and Rise of Donald Trump (July 2016) and Clinton and Trump (August 2016)

Photo by Gage Skidmore

(Transcript to follow)

State Crime and Colonialism: Call for papers

The academic journal, State Crime, Volume 7, Issue 2 (November 2018)  will be a special issue on State Crime and Colonialism.  The International State Crime Initiative, based in the School of Law in Queen Mary College, University of London, is calling for papers.

This special issue seeks to explore the relationships between state crime and colonialism. This includes the historical experiences of European colonialism and empire; settler colonialism and its ongoing impacts on Indigenous peoples; and the continuities of colonial violence. The aim is to develop dialogues on how understandings of state crime might further be developed and reformulated beyond contemporary human rights paradigms. Potential topics include but are not limited to: colonial genocide and violence against Indigenous peoples; dispossession, displacement and the control of resources; colonial law and human rights; forced removal of children; and colonial narratives of civilization, development and democracy. The deadline for submission of articles is 31 September 2017.

The timeline for submission and publication is as follows:

  • Deadline for submission of articles: 31 September 2017
  • Decisions/Reviewers’ responses to authors: 31 December 2017
  • Submission of final versions: 31 March 2018
  • Publication: November 2018

Anyone wishing to discuss a possible submission to this Special Issue should feel free to contact the Special Issue Editor, Dr. Michael Grewcock (m.grewcock@unsw.edu.au) or State Crime’s Associate Editor, Louise Wise (l.wise@qmul.ac.uk), although there is no need to do so nor formally register interest.

Please do share widely amongst colleagues and on social media.

State Crime is the first peer-reviewed, international journal that seeks to disseminate leading research on the illicit practices of states. The journal’s focus is a reflection of the growing awareness within criminology that state criminality is endemic and acts as a significant barrier to security and development. Topics covered by the journal include, torture; genocide and other forms of government and politically organised mass killing; war crimes; state-corporate crime; state-organised crime; natural disasters exacerbated by government (in)action; asylum and refugee policy and practice; state terror; political and economic corruption; and resistance to state violence and corruption.

Photo: Open Democracy

UK solar industry is ‘reeling’

China is investing heavily in the development of renewable energy, despite tumbling oil and gas prices, but the UK appears to be going in the opposite direction.

In 2014, for example, China invested $90 billion, more than any other country. In particular it has has been fast expanding its solar power industry and has built a large number of solar farms in the Gobi Desert.  Many scientists believe the UK government should also be promoting and investing in solar power, especially after the Brexit vote, when we should be seeking to develop modern, future-proof industries.

But that does not seem to be what is happening, as one of Pod Academy’s contributors, Professor Keith Barnham has said today.  In a letter to The Guardian, he points out that under government plans, prudent state schools which invested in solar panels to reduce their electricity bills may now face a retrospective six to eight fold hike in their tax rates (private schools, academies and free schools which are charities will be exempt).   In July this year it was estimated that 12,000 jobs in the solar industry would be lost in the UK as a result of cuts in subsidies, and these latest tax rises (due to come into force in April next year) are likely to make things worse.

“This is yet another blow to the solar industry, already reeling from four separate subsidy cuts since May 2015.  UK solar had been expanding exponentially, creating many new jobs and reducing our carbon emissions.” writes Professor Barnham.

Our podcast, Solar Power, the burning answer features Professor Barnham talking to Radu Sporea.

The future of the press

“If information is not reliable and verifiable, it is at best useless and at worst dangerous,” newspaper publisher Ken Waddell told the Canadian parliament – which is investigating what is happening to the media and the likely future of the press.

It is estimated that the US and Canada have lost 50% of their journalists over the past 10 years.  Continuing falls in sales and advertising revenue (the long decline in print advertising actually accelerated in 2016) mean a smaller and weaker press.  And that could have dire consequences for democracy.

Important questions are:

  • Is journalism a public good?  And if so, how do we pay for it?
  • What is the role of Google and Facebook in delivering news and comment?
  • What are the media models, new and legacy, likely to propel us into the 2020s?

For more on the Canadian investigation and the current state of the press see Nieman Lab blog:  Newsonomics

Rethinking the ethics of embryo research – Conference, London, 7th December

Embryo research could lead to the discovery of new medical treatments that would alleviate the suffering of many people. But is it ‘playing God’?  Different countries have addressed the moral dilemmas involved in embryo research very differently.  Is it time for a rethink in the UK?

The Progress Educational Trust is holding a public conference RETHINKING THE ETHICS OF EMBRYO RESEARCH: GENOME EDITING, 14 DAYS AND BEYOND  which will take place in London from 9.30am-5pm on Wednesday 7 December 2016.

 Speakers include Professor Magdalena Zernicka-Goetz from the University of Cambridge (leader of recent research in which human embryos were cultured in vitro for 13 days, the longest time ever achieved),  Dr Kathy Niakan from the Francis Crick Institute (the first researcher licensed by the UK regulator to use genome editing in human embryo research), and former Archbishop of Cantebury, Lord George Carey.

 There will also be keynote addresses by Baroness Mary Warnock who originally proposed the 14-day limit on human embryo research, and whose Warnock Report is arguably the world’s most influential analysis of the ethics of assisted reproduction and embryo research and Professor Sir Ian Wilmut, creator of Dolly the sheep, the first mammal ever cloned from an adult cell.

 

Conference sessions include:

• ‘THE WARNOCK REPORT AND THE 14 DAY RULE’

• ‘THE 14 DAY RULE: CALLING TIME ON EMBRYO RESEARCH’

• ‘GENOME EDITING: CRISPR AT THE CUTTING EDGE’

• ‘WHAT’S SO SPECIAL ABOUT THE STATUS OF THE EMBRYO?’

 The conference is supported by Merck, the Anne McLaren Memorial Trust Fund, the Medical Research Council and the London Women’s Clinic, and Caribou Biosciences.

 Full details of the conference, including the agenda and how to book places, can be found at http://www.progress.org.uk/conference2016

Photo: Joseph Elsbernd

14 November: the first ‘super moon’ for 60 years

The biggest “supermoon” since 1948 will grace the sky on November 14. But what makes it so super? Well, not much more than the fact that it’ll be a bit bigger than normal, but that’s absolutely no reason not to go outside and look at it anyway. If you miss it, you’ll have to wait to around November 25, 2034 for another chance.

This piece by Dr Chris North, science lecturer at Cardiff University was first posted on The Conversation website.

The occurrence of a supermoon, or to give it its proper name, a “super perigee full moon”, is not particularly uncommon. It is the result of two regular astronomical events happening at about the same time.

As the moon orbits the Earth it moves around the sky relative to the sun. This means we see different proportions illuminated from one night to the next – an effect known as the phases of the moon. Once per orbit the moon is opposite the sun in the sky, meaning that the side facing the Earth is fully illuminated. This happens about once a month, so hopefully isn’t that unfamiliar to most people.

The other regular event requires little explaining: it is simply the moon’s “perigee”, or closest approach to the Earth. Although the moon orbits the Earth once every 27 days or so (actually about 27 days and eight hours), it doesn’t go round in a perfect circle. Instead it traces out an ellipse or oval shape, getting slightly closer and further from the Earth over the course of its orbit. At its closest the moon is just under 360,000km away, while at its furthest it is at a distance of around 405,000km. The closer an object like the moon is to Earth the larger it appears in the sky.

The Moon’s orbit, showing perigee and full moon. Chris North/Cardiff Uni.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At around 1:30pm (GMT) on November 14, the Earth, sun and moon will be almost perfectly in a line (an effect known as a “syzygy”), with the moon directly opposite the sun. A couple of hours earlier, at about 11:30pm, it will also have reached its closest point to Earth – perigee – at a distance of 356,500km. It will then begin moving further away very slowly – but by the time the sun sets and the moon rises in the UK, it will only be about 50km further away, which isn’t much in the grand scheme of things.

Both of these effects happen about once a month, so you might think that there’s no reason why every full moon shouldn’t be the same. However, there’s another effect that means they get out of sync – the fact that the Earth is orbiting the sun. This means that the moon’s closest approach can occur at any point in its orbit around the Earth.

To see why, fast forward to when the moon will once again be back at the same point in its orbit – in about 27 days. But over those 27 days the Earth has moved round the sun a bit, so the moon has to “catch up” over the course of a couple of days to get back to being opposite the sun, by which point it’s not at perigee anymore. This “catching up” is why the moon orbits the Earth in 27.3 days, but there are between 29 and 30 days between full moons. Over time, the perigee and full moon get more and more out of sync, but after a year or two they get more or less back in sync again.

Catching the event

The reason this perigee full moon is quite so “super” is because perigee and full moon happen at almost exactly the same time, so the moon is at its closest possible when it’s also at its fullest. There are a number of other subtle effects that cause the moon’s orbit to vary slightly in size and shape, but this one pips the last few decades’ worth of super perigee full moons by a few hundred kilometres. In 2034, when we’ll have a similarly big supermoon, it will occur within a few minutes of its closest approach, and even then it will be just 100km closer than this month’s full moon.

These differences are pretty small, and with the moon rising so high in the sky, as it does in the winter months, it’ll be quite hard to notice any difference without comparing photographs. But regardless of how big and bright it looks, the moon really is a beautiful object to look at. Of course, it might be cloudy on Monday night – though it can be rather atmospheric to see the bright, full moon through thin cloud. Even if it’s completely overcast, there are plenty of other chances to see the moon as it gradually moves past its full phase over the next few nights so don’t be disheartened. It rises at different times of day and night as it orbits the Earth, so isn’t always up at the same time, but it’s not going anywhere

The lunar phases will continue unabated, and a few weeks after the full moon the crescent moon will be in the evening skies again (and will also be visible in the daytime) so go and have a look again, and see how it compares. When it’s not full, the terminator (the line between the light and dark parts of the moon) can look amazing through binoculars, as the angle of the sun’s light picks out the shadows of the craters and mountains and gives it a jagged, three-dimensional look.

So if you’ve never really looked at the moon – I mean really looked at it – make this your excuse to go outside and look up.

 

Picture:  Moon by Camila MP

If there was a Nobel silver medal, I’d award it to Jeffrey Gordon and our gut microbes

So says Tim SpectorProfessor of Genetic Epidemiology at King’s College London in this post that first appeared on The Conversation website on 4 October 2016, as gut microbes are being used, and actively explored, as exciting treatments for many common diseases..

………….

A hot tip for this year’s Nobel Prize in physiology or medicine was Jeffrey Gordon. (In case you missed it, the prize went to Yoshinori Ohsumi.) Over the past 15 years, Gordon has progressed an obscure study of boring gut microbes to being a nearly daily topic in the media. Although often over-hyped, gut microbes are being used, and actively explored, as exciting treatments for many common diseases.

Publicity-shy Gordon is rarely seen outside St Louis, US. Yet he saw, before anyone else, the potential of the field. He has a knack for attracting the brightest and best to his lab and is the father figure of a rapidly expanding field. His former pupils have become professorial ambassadors for the study of microbes in the US and Europe.

What makes his study of microbes worthy? The community of microbes in the human body is now known as the microbiome and 99% reside in our large intestine – made up of bacteria, viruses, fungi and protists. There are around 100 trillion of them and – excluding our red blood cells – they outnumber our human cells ten to one. They are key to digesting carbohydrates high in fibre, and producing immune-suppressing chemicals to keep allergies at bay. With 200 times more genes than us, they also produce many of our metabolites and around 25% of our vitamins as well as brain chemicals like serotonin that influence our mood.

Gordon’s interest in the possible health benefits of microbes started in the 1990s when methods of detection were primitive – based on culture methods. But with genetic techniques, the full array, diversity and therapeutic potential of the 100 trillion microbes inside us became clear to him. He was the first to explore the role microbes could play in obesity using lab mice.

The link between gut microbes and obesity

In a series of experiments with his talented team he first showed that the microbes were disrupted in over-fed obese mice. But his skill and insight was in using germ-free mice who had been born and brought up in germ-free conditions to show that these effects were causal. They showed that sterile mice could eat what they liked without putting on weight. But, when inoculated with normal mouse microbes and given the same food, they put on weight. This clearly showed that microbes were crucial to digesting food. When they transplanted microbes from fat mice into skinny sterile mice they made them obese.

Gordon followed up this study using three pairs of adult human twins who differed in weight. When they took a stool sample from the fatter twin and placed it into the guts of a sterile mouse, it became fatter than the mouse receiving the transplant from the slimmer twin. Suddenly obesity could be transferred from one animal to another and you could now think of obesity as an infectious disease, suggesting you might need to be careful who you sit next to. But follow-up experiments showed that microbes from guts of lean mice were more likely to colonise an obese mouse’s gut than vice versa, suggesting that skinny people and their healthy microbes are less likely to be invaded by obesity prone microbes.

These pivotal experiments in sterile mice led to human faecal transplantstudies by others, including a clinical trial of faecal transplants from normal donors into patients with obesity and diabetes. The study was too small to show a reduction in weight, but the diabetes improved. Other larger faecal transplant studies are underway, looking at it as a treatment for obesity and a wide range of other common diseases.

Faecal transplant is now the mainstream treatment worldwide for severe recurrent gut infections (C. difficile). Gordon’s ideas migrated from obesity in the West to curing malnutrition in African children who often died mysteriously from a deficiency disease called Kwashiorkor, despite treatment with food supplements. By studying Malawian twins, one with and one without the disease, he showed that the microbes of the affected kids had been disturbed and when transplanted from the kids into mice, stopped sterile mice gaining weight on normal diets.

Your weight-loss treatment is ready. Cjc2nd, CC BY-NC-SA

The team are now using microbiome testing and probiotics to modify the gut community and find the right nutritional treatments. His experiments have shown that understanding the complex interactions between our diets, environment and our gut microbes is crucial for our health. I’m grateful for a rare negative experiment he performed that provoked me to join this field. This small twin study showed no difference in gut microbiomes between twins. I repeated the experiment a few years later with ten times the sample size of twins and with one of his former team at Cornell University found a small but clear genetic component for the health-related gut microbes which Gordon had suspected existed all along.

Although we all have a unique microbiome that is influenced by multiple factors, our diet, our environment, diseases and even our genes, Gordon’s pioneering work has ensured that despite its complexity and our incomplete understanding, humans can now harness this novel microbiome organ to improve our health. The last big surprise Nobel winner was Barry Marshall in 2005 who bravely swallowed H. pylorimicrobes to prove they were bad guys and caused stomach ulcers. We now know that most microbes are our friends. Gordon and our 100 trillion hard-working microbes will have to wait for their just rewards.

Main photo: Day Donaldson, The Speaker